Hazrat Bishr bin Bara (ra) bin Ma'rur

Hazrat Bishr bin Bara bin Ma‘rur (ra) belonged to the Banu Ubaid bin Adiyy of the Khazraj tribe of the Ansar. According to another narration, he belonged to Banu Salama; these are two different narrations. 

*(al-Sirat al-Nabawiyyah li Ibn Hisham, p. 471, al-Ansar wa man ma’ahum, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2001) (Usdul 
Ghabah, Vol. 1, p. 380, Bishr bin al-Bara (ra), Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2008)*

Hazrat Bishr’s (ra) father’s name was Hazrat Bara bin Ma‘rur (ra) and the name of his mother was Khulaida bint Qais. 

*(al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Sa‘d, Vol. 3, p. 291, Bishr bin al-Bara (ra), Dar Ihyaa al-Turath al-Arabi, Beirut, 1996)*


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/kSfJAP8MCoc?start=978" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Introduction

The father of Hazrat Bishr (ra), Hazrat Bara bin Ma‘rur (ra) was among the twelve appointed chiefs during the Second Bai‘at at Aqabah and was the chief of the tribe of Banu Salama. Hazrat Bara (ra) passed away during a journey one month prior to the migration to Medina. When the Holy Prophet (sa) had migrated to Medina, he visited his grave and recited four takbirat. 

*(Usdul Ghabah, Vol. 1, pp. 365-366, al-Bara bin Ma‘rur (ra), Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2008)*


His Father

Hazrat Bishr (ra) participated in the Second Bai‘at at Aqabah along with his father. Furthermore, from among the companions, Hazrat Bishr bin Bara (ra) was a skilled archer. The Holy Prophet (sa) established a bond of brotherhood between Hazrat Bishr (ra) and Hazrat Waqid bin Abdullah (ra), who had come from Mecca to Medina. Hazrat Bishr (ra) participated alongside the Holy Prophet (sa) in the Battle of Badr, Uhud, Khandaq, the treaty of Hudaybiyyah and the Battle of Khaybar. 

*(al-Isabah Fi Tamyeez al-Sahabah, Vol. 1, p. 426, Bishr bin al-Bara (ra) Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2005) (al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Sa‘d, Vol. 3, p. 291, Bishr bin al-Bara (ra), Dar Ihyaa al-Turath al-Arabi, Beirut, 1996)*


Participation in Battles & Bond of Brotherhood

Abdur Rahman bin Abdullah narrates that the Holy Prophet (sa) said, “O Banu Nazala (in some narrations it is written as Banu Salama)! Who is your leader?” They replied, “Jadd bin Qais.” The Holy Prophet (sa) said, “On what basis do you consider him to be your leader?” They replied, “He is wealthier than us and is affluent. Therefore, we have made him our leader. However, the only fault we find in him is that he is miserly.” They did not like that he was extremely miserly. The Holy Prophet (sa) said, “Is there a greater shortcoming than miserliness?” In other words, miserliness was a grave flaw and owing to this he could not be their leader. They replied, “O Messenger (sa) of Allah! Do tell us then who is our leader?” The Holy Prophet (sa) said, “Bishr bin Bara bin Ma‘rur (ra) is your leader,” i.e., the companion who is being mentioned. According to another narration, it is recorded that the Holy Prophet (sa) said, “Your leader is Bishr bin Bara bin Ma‘rur (ra), who has a fair complexion and curly hair.” 

*(al-Isabah Fi Tamyeez al-Sahabah, Vol. 1, pp. 426-427, Bishr bin al-Bara (ra), Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2005) (al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Sa‘d, Vol. 3, p. 291, Bishr bin al-Bara (ra), Dar Ihyaa al-Turath al-Arabi, Beirut, 1996)*


Appointed as a Leader

Hazrat Bishr bin Bara (ra) married Hazrat Qubaisa bint Saifi (ra), and they had a daughter named Aaliya. Hazrat Qubaisa (ra) accepted Islam and pledged allegiance to the Holy Prophet (sa). 

*(al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Sa‘d, Vol. 8, p. 435, Qubaisah bint Saifi (ra), Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 1996)*


Family

Hazrat Ibn Abbas (ra) narrates, “Prior to the advent of the Holy Prophet (sa), the Jews used to pray for victory against the tribes of Aus and Khazraj by supplicating in their prayers for the prophet [whose advent was foretold in the earlier scriptures].” They used to fight with one another and prayed for victory to be granted to them in the name of the prophet, whose advent had been prophesied, and would supplicate to God Almighty for this. However, when God Almighty raised the Holy Prophet (sa) from among the Arabs, they rejected his message. This has been the practice of those who reject [prophets] from time immemorial.

Once, Hazrat Mu‘az bin Jabal (ra), Hazrat Bishr bin Bara (ra) and Hazrat Daud bin Salama (ra) said to them, “O Jews! Fear God and accept Islam. Prior to this you would pray for victory through the advent of a prophet by the name of Muhammad, and would say that this prophet would appear, whose name would be Muhammad. You would pray for victory through him. Prior to this we were idolaters.” Hazrat Bishr bin Bara (ra) then said, “We were among those who associated partners with God and regarding us you would say that a prophet would appear, and the time has come for his advent. You would narrate to us about the signs of his coming. But now that he has appeared, why do you not accept him?”

Salam bin Mishkam – the leader and treasurer of the Jewish tribe of Banu Nazir, and also the husband of Zainab bint Harith, the woman who offered poisoned meat to the Holy Prophet (sa) during the battle of Khaybar – replied, “This prophet has not brought to us anything that we recognise and he is not that prophet whom we described to you.” Despite the fact that all the signs that they used to mention themselves were fulfilled, their answer was that the Holy Prophet (sa) did not bring what they could recognise and so all the signs had not been fulfilled. Hence they did not accept him. Subsequently God Almighty revealed the following verse:

وَ لَمَّا جَآءَہُمۡ کِتٰبٌ مِّنۡ عِنۡدِ اللّٰہِ مُصَدِّقٌ لِّمَا مَعَہُمۡ ۙ وَ کَانُوۡا مِنۡ قَبۡلُ یَسۡتَفۡتِحُوۡنَ عَلَی الَّذِیۡنَ کَفَرُوۡا ۚۖ فَلَمَّا جَآءَہُمۡ مَّا عَرَفُوۡا کَفَرُوۡا بِہٖ ۫ فَلَعۡنَۃُ اللّٰہِ عَلَی الۡکٰفِرِیۡنَ

‘And when there came to them a Book from Allah, fulfilling that which is with them – and before that they had prayed for victory over the disbelievers – yet when there came to them that which they knew, they rejected it. The curse of Allah be on the disbelievers.’ [Surah al-Baqarah, Ch.2: V.90] 

*(al-Siratun Nabawiyyah Li Ibn Kathir, p. 381, Ma Nazala min al-Baqarah fi al-Munafiqin wal yahud, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2001) (al-Siratun Nabawiyyah Li Ibn Kathir, p. 512, Ghazwah Suwaiq, p. 698, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2001) (al-Raud al-Anf Fi Sharh al-Sirat al-Nabawiyyah Li ibn Hisham, Vol. 2, p. 325, bab Kahinah Quraish, Maktabah ibn Taimiyyah, 1990)*


Jewish Opposition to Islam

Hazrat Zubair bin Awwam (ra) relates, “During the Battle of Uhud, when the situation of the battle changed dramatically, I was near the Holy Prophet (sa). At the time, we were stunned and in a state of shock, when a state of sleep descended upon us. It was such a state that it felt as if we had been overtaken by slumber. There was not a single one of us whose chin was not resting on their chest,” i.e., their heads were lowered in this state of sleep and drowsiness. “By God, it felt to me as though I had heard the voice of Mu’attib (ra) bin Qushair in my sleep and he was saying to me that if it was up to us to decide, we would never die here in this manner.” Hazrat Mu’attib (ra) bin Qushair was an Ansari Companion who participated in the pledge at Aqabah and the battles of Badr and Uhud. “I committed to memory the words I had heard in my state of slumber. With regard to this occasion, God Almighty revealed the following verse:

ثُمَّ اَنۡزَلَ عَلَیۡکُمۡ مِّنۡۢ بَعۡدِ الۡغَمِّ اَمَنَۃً نُّعَاسًا یَّغۡشٰی طَآئِفَۃً مِّنۡکُمۡ ۙ وَ طَآئِفَۃٌ قَدۡ اَہَمَّتۡہُمۡ اَنۡفُسُہُمۡ یَظُنُّوۡنَ بِاللّٰہِ غَیۡرَ الۡحَقِّ ظَنَّ الۡجَاہِلِیَّۃِ ؕ یَقُوۡلُوۡنَ ہَلۡ لَّنَا مِنَ الۡاَمۡرِ مِنۡ شَیۡءٍ ؕ قُلۡ اِنَّ الۡاَمۡرَ کُلَّہٗ لِلّٰہِ

‘Then, after the sorrow, He sent down peace on you – a slumber that overcame a party of you – while the other party was anxious concerning their own selves, thinking wrongly of Allah like unto the thought of ignorance. They said, ‘Is there for us any part in the government of affairs?’ Say, ‘All government belongs to Allah.’’ [Surah al-e-Imran, Ch.3: V.155]

Hazrat Ka‘b bin Amr Ansari (ra) states, “On the day of the Battle of Uhud, I was with 14 of my fellow tribesmen alongside the Holy Prophet (sa). Thereafter, we were overtaken by a state of slumber which granted us peace,” i.e., the slumber brought about tranquillity in them. “Although we were still in the midst of a battle, yet this slumber granted us contentment. There was not a single person from among us who one could not hear the sound of snoring from.” At times, one can enter into a state of deep sleep.

He further says, “I witnessed the sword of Bishr bin Bara bin Ma‘rur (ra) (i.e., the companion being mentioned) fall out of his hand, but he was completely unaware of this, all the while, the idolaters were advancing towards us.” 

*(al-Sirat al-Halabiyyah, Vol. 2, p. 310, Dhikr Maghaziyah, Ghazwah Uhud, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2002) (Usdul Ghabah, Vol. 4, p. 432, Mu’tab bin Qashir (ra), Dar-ul-Fikr, Beirut, 2003)*

Nonetheless, it may well be that he perceived the sword to have fallen, because despite their state of slumber, they were used to gripping their weapons firmly or they would feel a sudden jerk if it began to slip out of their hands. The word used in this verse is nu‘as and Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IV (rh) has explained its meaning in great detail in one of his lectures. He said that analysing all the various meanings of the words “Amantan nu‘asan”, they can be summarised in this verse to mean, “After your sorrow, such a tranquillity was sent down upon you which can be termed as a form of sleep, or such a slumber which bestowed peace”; or that God sent down upon them peace and tranquillity, which had similar effects to that of sleep. Hence, this is the meaning of “Amantan nu‘asan”.

Slumber also means to momentarily lower one’s head when overcome with sleep. However, this meaning of nu‘as does not apply here, rather the meaning in this context is a state that is between one being awake and asleep.

Prior to falling asleep, there is a state where all of one’s nerves and every part of the body experiences a state of calm, and this indeed is a state of complete contentment. If this state is prolonged, then one falls asleep. If one is walking whilst they experience such a state, they will fall over, or at the least, they will feel a sudden jerk and then realise what state they had just experienced. However, if one falls asleep, they do not have voluntary control over their nerves and parts of the body.

Nonetheless, it could be the case that Bishr bin Bara (ra) experienced this state of deep sleep, but it was sleep that was peaceful. Despite the fact that they were in the middle of a battle, he experienced a state of tranquillity which results in one’s muscles to completely relax. For this reason, if we accept this to be the case, it was therefore owing to this state that his hands became slightly relaxed and his sword fell down. Nevertheless, this is such a state that one quickly realises that they are about to fall into deep sleep and owing to a sudden jolt, they wake up. Thus, God Almighty states that He sent down peace upon them, which was similar to that of sleep, but not deep sleep whereby one loses voluntary control over their senses. It granted them peace and tranquillity, but did not render them ineffectual.

In a hadith of Bukhari, Hazrat Abu Talha (ra) narrates, “On the day of Uhud, we were overcome by slumber at the peak of the battle.” This was the slumber that was referred to earlier. Hazrat Abu Talha (ra) further states, “My sword would constantly slip out of my hand, but then I would grip it firmly again.” Thus, from this hadith it shows that it was not such deep sleep whereby the possessions in their hands would drop, or that they would fall over whilst walking. Although it was a state of tranquillity, they had full control over their senses. [He says:] “When the sword would slip, I would grip it firmly.” Thus, it was not the case that slumber suddenly overcame them, rather this was a state that descended over them for a short while.

In Tirmidhi, Abwab-ut-Tafseer, Hazrat Abu Talha (ra) narrates, “During the Battle of Uhud, I looked around and saw that every single person was slouched behind their shields in a state of slumber.” This was owing to them remaining awake or due to tiredness, but the companions were in a difficult condition. God Almighty then caused a state of peace and tranquillity to descend upon them. It was not a state that is usually experienced by soldiers who become tired after a battle, rather Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IV (rh) has stated that it was as if something suddenly descended from the heavens upon all the Companions (ra) alongside the Holy Prophet (sa), who were engaged in fighting against the enemy, and this state then overtook the Companions (ra). At the time, they were in dire need of this source of peace. They needed to refresh and awaken their senses, but there was no time to take any rest. When someone experiences this and is tired to such an extent, this state can be experienced.

Nonetheless, if everyone suddenly falls in a state of slumber such as this, when the battle is at its peak and one is fearful of an attack by the enemy, then this is a miracle and not a coincidence. This can happen to certain people and this did not take place by chance, rather it was a miracle and God Almighty sent down this state of peace upon them at that time. 

*(Ma‘khuz Dars al-Quran biyan farmudah Khalifatul Masih al-Rabi‘, 6 Ramadan al-Mubarak, 17, Feb 1994)*

The Incident of Slumber at the Battle of Uhud

During the Battle of Khaybar, Hazrat Bishr (ra) also ate the poisoned goat meat alongside the Holy Prophet (sa), which was given to them as a gift by a Jewish woman. When Hazrat Bishr (ra) swallowed a piece of the meat, he had not yet moved from his place when all of a sudden, his facial complexion changed and became like telasaan – a cloth which was predominately black in colour. The pain was so severe, that for an entire year he was unable to turn over in bed without assistance and eventually, he passed away in this painful state. It is also stated [in other narrations] that the poison was so deadly that he had not yet moved from his place when after a short while of eating the meat, he passed away. 

*(al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Sa‘d, Vol. 3, p. 291, Dar Ihyaa al-Turath al-Arabi, Beirut, 1996)*

When Hazrat Bishr bin Bara (ra) passed away, his mother was severely grief stricken. She went to the Holy Prophet (sa) and said, “O Messenger of Allah (sa), the death of Bishr (ra) will destroy the Banu Salamah! Those destined to die from among the Banu Salamah will indeed pass away, however, will the deceased recognise one another? ([meaning that] owing to the impact of this action of the enemy, the Banu Salamah will be greatly affected, [so] will the deceased recognise one another) And is there any way of sending greetings to Bishr?” The Holy Prophet (sa) replied, “O Umme Bishr! Indeed, they will recognise one another. I swear by Him Who holds my life in His hands, just as birds recognise one another in the trees, in the same manner the inhabitants of paradise will recognise one another.” 

*(Subul al-Hudaa Wa al-Rashaad, Vol. 3, p. 132, Fi Tanbihaat Alaa Ba’d fawa’id Tata’aluq bi Qissati al-Mi’raj, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 1993)*

This meant that they would be able to recognise one another and that she would be able to send her greetings to him with those who are close to their death.

In another narration it is stated that after hearing this response from the Holy Prophet (sa), whenever a person from among the Banu Salamah neared their end, the mother of Hazrat Bishr (ra) would go to that person and say, “O such and such, peace be upon you,” to which they would reply in kind. She would then say, “Please convey my greetings to Bishr (ra). 

*(Mirqaatul Mafaatih Sharh Mishkaat al-Masaabih, Vol. 4, p. 99, Kitabul Jana‘iz, Bab Ma Yuqalu ‘Inda Man Hadarahu 
al-Maut, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2003)*

Whenever a person from among the Banu Salamah would near their death, she would go to them and ask them to convey her greetings. Earlier, while referring to the statement that “Bishr’s death would destroy the Banu Salamah, therefore would the deceased be able to recognise one another?”, it may seem as if Hazrat Bishr’s (ra) mother was the enemy, however this is not the case, rather it was a particular style of expressing her grief. Therefore, as a result of this enormous grief, she asked if the deceased would recognise one another and whether her greetings could be conveyed to Bishr (ra). The Holy Prophet (sa) replied in the affirmative, and as a result, she would visit every person who was nearing death to convey her greetings to Bishr (ra) in Paradise.

In one narration, the sister of Hazrat Bishr (ra) visited the Holy Prophet (sa) close to the time of his demise. The Holy Prophet (sa) said to her, “The morsel that I ate along with your brother at Khaybar has severed my insides.” 

*(al-Sirat al-Halabiyyah, Vol. 3, p. 82, Bab Dhikr Maghaziyah, Ghazwah Khaybar, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2002)*

Explaining this incident in detail, Hazrat Musleh Maud (ra) states:

“A Jewish woman asked the Companions (ra) what part of an animal the Holy Prophet (sa) preferred to eat. She was told that he preferred the shoulder of lamb or goat. The woman slaughtered a goat and made cutlets on hot stones. Then she mixed with them a deadly poison, especially in pieces cut from the shoulder, believing the Holy Prophet (sa) would prefer them. The Holy Prophet (sa) was returning to his tent after having led the evening prayers in congregation. He saw this woman waiting for him near his tent and asked, ‘Is there anything I can do for you?’

“She said, ‘Yes, Abul-Qasim, you can accept a present from me.’ The Holy Prophet (sa) asked a Companion to take whatever the woman had brought. When the Holy Prophet (sa) sat down to eat his meal, this present of roasted meat was also laid before him. The Holy Prophet (sa) took a morsel. A companion, Bashir bin Bara bin Ma‘rur (ra) also took a morsel.” Some books of history state the name as Bishr bin Bara, whereas in other places it is recorded as Bashir bin Bara. Hazrat Musleh Maud (ra) has mentioned the name Bashir bin Bara, i.e. the same Bishr bin Bara (ra).

“The other Companions present at the meal stretched their hands to eat the meat. But the Holy Prophet(sa) stopped them saying, ‘My hand has informed me that the meat has been poisoned.’”

This did not mean that he had received a revelation, rather this is an expression used by the Arabs, which meant that upon tasting the meat, the Holy Prophet (sa) thought that it was poisoned. Therefore, this is the meaning of the aforementioned phrase and the Holy Prophet (sa) used it as an expression. The meaning of “his hand informing him” was that upon tasting the meat, the Holy Prophet (sa) realised that the meat had been poisoned. The subsequent quote [in regard to the incident] would shed further light on the matter. Hazrat Musleh Maud (ra) has elaborated on this stating that the Holy Quran has made mention of a wall in the time of Prophet Moses (as). It is stated that “the wall wished for it to fall down”, however, this simply referred to the fact that the condition of the wall was such that it appeared that the wall would collapse at any moment. Thus, even in this incident this statement was in fact an expression.

Hazrat Musleh Maud (ra) then further says, “Bashir (ra), i.e. Bishr bin Bara, then said, ‘I swear by God, Who has granted you honour, I too thought the morsel was poisoned. I wished to spit out the morsel, however I thought that if I did so, then perhaps you may dislike my action and it may disturb you while you are eating.’” (He said that he too was hesitant about the food and thought there was something suspicious with it). “‘Seeing you take a morsel, I also took one, but I soon began to wish you had not taken yours as I suspected that it may have been poisoned.’ Soon afterwards Bashir (ra) became ill and, according to some reports, died there in Khaybar. According to other reports he died after remaining ill for some time.

“The Holy Prophet (sa) then took a piece of the meat and gave it to a dog, but it too died shortly after eating the meat. The Holy Prophet (sa) then sent for the woman and asked her if she had poisoned the meat. The woman asked the Holy Prophet (sa) how he ever got to know about it. The Prophet (sa) was holding a piece of the goat in his hand, and said, ‘My hand told me this,’ The woman then realised that the Holy Prophet (sa) had discovered the truth. The woman admitted what she had done. The Holy Prophet (sa) asked, ‘What made you commit such a heinous act?’ She replied, ‘My people were at war with you and my relations were killed in this battle, I decided to poison you, believing that if you were an impostor, you would die and we should be safe, but if you were a Prophet, God would save you.’ Hearing this explanation, the Holy Prophet (sa) forgave the woman. Otherwise she would surely have been given the death penalty. This incident shows that the Holy Prophet (sa) was ever ready to forgive those who attacked him and his followers, and punished only when punishment was necessary, when it was feared the guilty one would continue to cause mischief and strife.” 

*(Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwarul Ulum, Vol. 20, pp. 327-329)*

Eventual Demise in Result of Eating a Morsel of Poisoned Meat

Some enemies of Islam allege that the Holy Prophet (sa) passed away due to this poison. This has also been discussed in certain books of history and biographies of the Holy Prophet (sa). Certain historians are willing to accept the narrative that the Holy Prophet (sa) passed away due to this poison, as they wish to declare the Holy Prophet (sa) as a martyr. However, this is contrary to the facts. The research cell has also sent a report which will be mentioned here. It is written that irrespective of what is said in any book of history or biography of the Holy Prophet (sa) or any hadith, the Holy Prophet’s (sa) demise was not due to poisoning. If someone asserts this, then either they are ignorant of all the narrations, or they are mistaken.

It should be remembered that the incident of the poisoning took place during the Battle of Khaybar, which occurred at the end of 6 AH or the beginning of 7 AH and the Holy Prophet (sa) remained alive for approximately four more years. He lived a healthy life just as he did before the incident and even went for battles. There was not even the slightest change in his routine with respect to his worship or other daily activities. To pass away after approximately four years, owing to a fever and a migraine, no rational individual would assert that his death was due to the effects of poisoning.

In actuality, there is a hadith recorded in Bukhari as well as some other books of hadith and owing to not understanding the translation correctly, people have inferred from it that the Holy Prophet’s (sa) demise was due to the effects of poisoning, whereas this is incorrect. The hadith mentioned in Bukhari is as follows – the translation is:

Hazrat Aisha(ra) narrates that during his last days, the Holy Prophet (sa) would say, “O Aisha (ra)! I have always felt the effects of what I ate at Khaybar. Even today, I feel as if my insides are have been greatly affected due to the poison.” 

*(Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitabul Maghazi, Bab Marad an-Nabisa wa Wafatihi, Hadith 5073)*

From this hadith, some Muslims – Muslim exegetes and scholars of Hadith – have inferred that the Holy Prophet (sa) passed away due to the effects of the poison. Some of them then explain that owing to this, the Holy Prophet (sa) can be deemed as a martyr, whereas this narration does not support this viewpoint. In this narration, the Holy Prophet (sa) simply expressed a sense of pain he felt. Everyone is aware that an injury or [specific] pain can revert at times owing to certain factors. If one analyses the details regarding the narrations about the Holy Prophet (sa) eating poisoned meat at the time of Khaybar, it is also written that the Holy Prophet (sa) put the poisoned meat in his mouth but did not swallow it. Even if he did swallow it, the fact that he lived a healthy life is proof that his death was not as a result of the poison. Indeed, the poison would have had a severe effect on the stomach or intestines and this is a natural consequence of it. Likewise, since the morsel was placed in his mouth, it would have affected the uvula and owing to this he may have occasionally felt pain whilst eating.

All the details regarding this incident can be found in the ahadith. It is also written that the Holy Prophet (sa) knew that the meat had been poisoned and he stopped his companions (ra) from eating it. When the Holy Prophet (sa) called the woman responsible for it and asked her, she said she added poison to see that if the Holy Prophet (sa) was a true prophet of God, he would be saved. Otherwise, they would be rid of him. The Jews even admit to the fact that the Holy Prophet (sa) survived. The poison that was used was fatal, yet the Holy Prophet (sa) survived. In fact, according to some narrations, this woman then accepted Islam. Nevertheless, the Jews themselves admit that the Holy Prophet (sa) survived and consider this to be a miracle. Therefore, it is utterly false to assert that the Holy Prophet (sa) passed away due to the effects of the poison.

Profile of Bishr bin Bara (ra) bin Ma‘rur

Test your knowledge